Skip to content
Environmental engineering consulting · Phoenixville, PA

Contaminated ground,
brought to closure.

AEM takes properties with contaminated soil, groundwater and sediment through characterisation, remedy selection and regulatory sign-off — and testifies when those sites end up in court.

Published papers & chapters
37Published papers & chapters
Sediment projects catalogued
120+Sediment projects catalogued
Expert testimony engagements
4Expert testimony engagements
Named clients
62Named clients
Who you are hiring

One principal, personally on the file.

Mark K. Hammaker, P.E.Principal & President. Work is not handed down to a junior team; the person who signs the report is the person who reviews the data and stands behind it under cross-examination.

  • Licensed Professional Engineer

    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

  • Board Certified Environmental Engineer

    Hazardous Waste Management — American Academy of Environmental Engineers

  • Qualified Environmental Professional

    Institute of Professional Environmental Practice

Full profile and career background →

Deep specialisms

Where the file is unusually hard.

Most consultancies can run a Phase I. These are the areas where AEM has spent decades, published the method, and been asked to defend it.

Contaminated sediments
Freshwater and marine sediment remediation — dredging, capping and monitored natural recovery — backed by a fifteen-year database of over 120 sediment projects across the U.S. and Canada.
Chromium
Over twenty years on chromium chemistry in soils: speciation, analytical method development, bench-scale and pilot treatability testing, peer-reviewed publication and patent applications.
PCBs
PCB transport and fate, cleanup levels and disposal approvals across pipeline systems, industrial sites and river sediments — including testimony on historical handling practice.
Brownfields & legacy sites
Sites carrying VOCs, SVOCs, PCBs, pesticides, dioxins and furans, and TAL metals, taken through PA Act 2 to a release of liability.
Immediate-threat sites
Sites presenting an immediate threat to human health or the environment, where response planning and interim measures come before study.
Data & facility audit
Critical review of environmental data, evaluation of environmental response actions, and audits of commercial hazardous waste facilities.
How a job runs

A remedy has to survive the regulator, the builder and the neighbours.

  1. 01

    Read the site, not the template

    Historical use, current conditions and the owner's intended future use decide the remedy. A solution that ignores any of the three gets rebuilt later at the client's expense.

  2. 02

    Match the criteria that actually apply

    Contaminants are addressed media by media against the cleanup criteria and technical requirements that genuinely govern the site — no more, and no less.

  3. 03

    Test the remedy against reality

    Technical soundness, practicality, reliability, constructability and cost-effectiveness — plus regulatory and community acceptance, which sink more remedies than engineering does.

  4. 04

    Hold the budget and the schedule

    Multi-disciplined project-specific teams, senior oversight, and documentation in the format the regulator expects — so that no further action is reached without a second round.

Who retains AEM

Industrials, pipelines, developers — and the firms that litigate for them.

Full client list →

National

  • Aker Kvaerner USA
  • Alcoa
  • Areva NP Inc.
  • Chemical Land Holdings Inc.
  • Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
  • Columbia Gulf Transmission Co.
  • + 13 more

Regional

  • Ames Reese Inc.
  • Chester County Intermediary Unit
  • Cohen Shapiro
  • Con-Tech Inc.
  • Concord Township, PA
  • Copperhead Chemical Company Inc.
  • + 21 more

Legal

  • Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP
  • Barnard Mezzanotte Pinne and Seelaus
  • Carson & Fitzgerald
  • Covington & Burling LLP
  • Cozen & O'Connor
  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • + 10 more

Describe the site. You’ll get a straight answer about what it needs.

A first conversation costs nothing and usually establishes within twenty minutes whether the problem is a Phase II, a remedy re-think, or a second opinion on someone else’s data.